Margaret Sanger, in her own words

Quotes from Margaret Sanger, Founder of the American Birth Control League, which then became Planned Parenthood, showing you the real mission of the organization, which is to implement Eugenics, especially on people of color:

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”  Margaret Sanger’s December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, 255 Adams Street, Milton, Massachusetts. Original source: Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, North Hampton, Massachusetts. Also described in Linda Gordon’s Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1976.

“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.” Margaret Sanger (editor). The Woman Rebel, Volume I, Number 1. Reprinted in Woman and the New Race. New York: Brentanos Publishers, 1922.

“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.” Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12.

“Eugenic sterilization is an urgent need … We must prevent multiplication of this bad stock.” Margaret Sanger, April 1933 Birth Control Review.

“Eugenics is … the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems.” Margaret Sanger. “The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda.” Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5.

“Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives.”[no source available at this time…] As an advocate of birth control I wish … to point out that the unbalance between the birth rate of the ‘unfit’ and the ‘fit,’ admittedly the greatest present menace to civilization, can never be rectified by the inauguration of a cradle competition between these two classes. In this matter, the example of the inferior classes, the fertility of the feeble-minded, the mentally defective, the poverty-stricken classes, should not be held up for emulation….On the contrary, the most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective.” Margaret Sanger. “The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda.” Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5.

“The campaign for birth control is not merely of eugenic value, but is practically identical with the final aims of eugenics.” Margaret Sanger. “The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda.” Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5.

“Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying … demonstrates our foolhardy and extravagant sentimentalism … [Philanthropists] encourage the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant … We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.” Margaret Sanger. The Pivot of Civilization, 1922. Chapter on “The Cruelty of Charity,” pages 116, 122, and 189. Swarthmore College Library edition.

“The undeniably feeble-minded should, indeed, not only be discouraged but prevented from propagating their kind.” Margaret Sanger, quoted by Charles Valenza in “Was Margaret Sanger a Racist?” Family Planning Perspectives, January-February 1985, page 44.

“The third group [of society] are those irresponsible and reckless ones having little regard for the consequences of their acts, or whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers. Many of this group are diseased, feeble-minded, and are of the pauper element dependent upon the normal and fit members of society for their support. There is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped.” Margaret Sanger. Speech quoted in Birth Control: What It Is, How It Works, What It Will Do. The Proceedings of the First American Birth Control Conference. Held at the Hotel Plaza, New York City, November 11-12, 1921. Published by the Birth Control Review, Gothic Press, pages 172 and 174.

**This list was not compiled by me, I came upon it, fact checked it, and feel it is important to pass on.  Margaret Sanger continues to be praised as a hero for women’s rights by Planned Parenthood, the National Organization for Women, and many other feminist organizations.
CO PP side v3.jpg
The above photo is courtesy of Colorado Right to Life.

Use of aborted fetuses in vaccinations

The issue of abortion is a hot button issue, as is the vaccine-autism controversy, but these two issues are closer related than you may imagine. There is much controversy over vaccinations and their ingredients, their effectiveness and efficacy, and side-effects, but many do not know about the usage of aborted fetal tissues in the creation and utilization of vaccinations.

Movies have been made regarding the use of organ and body donation (The Island, Never Let Me Go). They show the horror of human life used for the sole purpose of science. The main characters’ lives are taken when it is useful for society or the person who ‘bought’ their very creation needs an organ or tissue. What is even more horrendous is that embryonic stem cell research is claimed to be used ‘for the good of mankind.’ (In fact, adult stem cells have produced much more advancements.) What kind of a world do we live in, when embryos, and even fetuses, are used for scientific research? Why isn’t life valued? Adults, before they die, are given the choice if they want their bodies to be used for science or organ donation, but these fetuses have no choice. And now, their tissues and cells are being used, and injected into, the bodies of our children.

The Center for Disease Control has ‘Human Diploid Tissue’ listed for many vaccinations on their site: Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, MMR, Polio, Rabies, Varicella (Chicken Pox), Rubella. Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute also lists these on their site. In aborted fetal tissue research, as in any type of human tissue or organ transplant or research, it is essential that the samples collected are still living. It is not possible to simply perform an abortion and after the fact, decide one wants to use the discarded fetus for cell research. It is no different than prearranging the donation of one’s organs after death. Steps must be taken immediately to safeguard the life of the tissue or organs. The fetuses used for vaccine use were specifically chosen and worked on within seconds of a performed abortion.  Please see the Love the Truth site for further information and details on how these fetal cell lines were created and are used today.

“The Fetus As Transplant Donor the Scientific, Social, and Ethical Perspectives,” written by Peter McCullough, who is an immunologist at the University of Western Australia: “Healthy human fetuses from 7 to 21 weeks from legal abortions were used. 50% of the time, the baby would be born alive, but that didn’t stop them. They would just simply open up the abdomen of the baby with no anesthesia, and take out the liver and kidneys.”  See also: Harvesting the Fetus by Bernard Nathanson, M.D.

In the FDA report, detailing aborted fetuses, on page 81, lines 14-22, “The fetus, as far as I can remember was completely normal. Nothing was wrong. The reasons for the abortion were unknown to me. I probably knew it at the time, but it got lost, all this information.” States Dr. Van Der Eb, Crucel, “So I isolated retina from a fetus, from a healthy fetus as far as could be seen, of 18 weeks old. There was nothing special with a family history or the pregnancy was completely normal up to the 18 weeks, and it turned out to be a socially indicated abortus – abortus provocatus, and that was simply because the woman wanted to get rid of the fetus.”

Another important question: is DNA in vaccines and does it pose a risk to those who are injected? Does this have a part in the autism debate?  CBS wrote about this in March in “Vaccines and Autism: a new scientific review.”

Religious vaccine exemption waivers are available; you and your children have rights.

Are we there? Selling human baby organs and tissues to “save” other human lives? Will women contemplating an abortion choose to terminate their fetus because he/she could be used toward vaccinations and research and in the name of “saving” others? Will women get paid for it? Will the doctors, nurses, etc. be paid for selling these aborted babies? Is this an argument to support abortion? Have we gone mad?

“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you.” Jeremiah 1:5

(Contributor: L. Holland)

Wildflower Ramblings